Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsPrivate Property
IN THE NEWS

Private Property

OPINION
July 30, 2013 | By The Times editorial board
In a city derided for its lack of historic consciousness, murals tell the narrative of Los Angeles. Political movements, surfers' idylls, Hollywood stars - all have been captured on the sides of buildings, freeways and fences. Whether they are great art - some are, some are not - is almost beside the point. They are part of the cultural history of the city and its people. But since 2003, there has been an absolute prohibition on the creation of any murals on private property. The ban went into effect as part of the city's long-running billboard wars - it was an effort to prevent commercial sign companies from passing off advertisements as murals.
Advertisement
NEWS
October 10, 1990 | From Times Wire Services
Defiant Communist officials said today they oppose widespread private property and indicated the party will resist calls to give up its own vast holdings and share power in a coalition government. The officials, briefing reporters on a two-day Central Committee plenum that ended Tuesday, also rejected the elimination of party cells in the work place and said the Soviet Union will continue to celebrate Revolution Day as a national holiday. Vladimir A. Ivashko, the party's No.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
May 6, 2001
Re "Commission: Tramples Rights, Saves Coast," May 1. I applaud Judge Charles C. Kobayashi's ruling. It's about time someone stepped up and stood up to the California Coastal Commission. It has always amazed me and others how much power one commission can have. They are not about compromise, they are about taking private property regardless of the situation. They have no understanding of private property rights, no concept of local coastal issues or environmental issues. I'm all for the environment and try to do my part each and every day, but we have some serious housing issues in Southern California that need to be addressed and the commission is ignoring that fact.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
May 31, 1992
Rep. Anthony Beilenson recently requested $33 million from the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior. Beilenson said that the National Parks Service would use the money for a high priority acquisition such as the Soka University site in Calabasas. The fact is that Soka University is not for sale. Rep. Beilenson, therefore, is tacitly requesting the condemnation of private property. This is an assault on the Fourth Amendment rights of every citizen. There is no consensus for this action in our community.
OPINION
August 5, 2004
Re "Bait Shop Is Small Fry Amid the Sharks," Aug. 1: Steve Lopez took an easy potshot. Broad Beach in Malibu is private property above the mean high tide line, not public coastland as stated in his column. The hired hosts are necessary to keep the public out of the private property of the homeowners. There are no public facilities on Broad Beach. The public has used the backyards of residents for bathrooms and bedrooms and left much trash on the beach. Adjacent public Zuma Beach is patrolled in trucks, has lifeguards and offers public facilities.
NATIONAL
April 24, 2012 | By David G. Savage, Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to New York City's famed rent-control ordinance, a post-World War II housing measure that limits the rents of more than a million apartments. The court's refusal Monday to hear the case is a setback for property rights activists, who had hoped a more conservative court would protect landlords and a free market in rentals. For decades, critics have said rent-control laws deny property owners the right to fully profit from their investments.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
August 17, 1990
After the savings and loan scandal, the HUD scandal, the EPA scandal and the Pentagon spending scandal, the next scandal to be uncovered will be the redevelopment scandal in the cities across the nation. Developers are moving in and promoting the stealing of private property from owners of property just because these properties happen to be on valuable land that offers developers profit-making opportunities. The city government is encouraged to expropriate this private property, giving the rightful owners minimal compensation which would not permit them to even begin to duplicate their investment at current market prices.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|