YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsReproductive Rights

Reproductive Rights

On the June day that the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Pennsylvania law restricting abortion, a new breed of feminist descended on the Federal Building in Los Angeles. Although there were hundreds of protesters, about 50 women were there in what might be called a performance protest. Some pounded fiercely on drums while others, dressed in black judicial-like robes, marched and chanted, "No choice, no peace."
February 27, 1994 | Linda Gordon, Linda Gordon is Florence Kelley professor of history at the University of Wisconsin/Madison and author of "Woman's Body, Woman's Right: Birth Control in America." Her most recent book, "Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare," will be published by the Free Press in June
When I was in college around 1960, there was a great deal of borrowing and lending of a plain gold ring. Its purpose was to disguise its wearer as married so that she could get contraception--a diaphragm, the only reliable thing available then--from a New York physician whose name and address were also shared (he was an understanding Viennese who didn't believe the gold ring for a minute).
September 13, 1991
Why is it that criticizing the Catholic Church's attempts to limit safe-sex education and reproductive rights is Catholic-bashing, but terming lesbians and gay men repugnant, as the church has, is not gay-bashing? MARK KOSTOPOULOS Los Angeles
June 5, 1999 | From Times Wire Reports
The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League launched an offensive against Texas Gov. George W. Bush, even as the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination picked up another endorsement. A week before Bush was to make his first campaign trip to Iowa, Kate Michelman, president of the abortion rights group, was in the state meeting with supporters in hopes of organizing a bloc of such voters.
April 18, 1993 | PATRICK GOLDSTEIN, Patrick Goldstein is a frequent contributor to Calendar
In Adrian Lyne's new film, "Indecent Proposal," billionaire playboy Robert Redford comes to visit Demi Moore at her realty company. As he walks into her office, we catch a glimpse of Moore's secretary, a blond bimbo busily filing her nails and reading "Backlash," Susan Faludi's 1991 expose of the war against women's rights. The shot is meant as a playful jab at Faludi. But after seeing Lyne's new film, in which Redford offers a happily married young couple $1 million for a one-night stand with the sultry wife, the outspoken author--and many of her female Hollywood peers--are in no laughing mood.
December 6, 1990
It was most interesting to read of the conservative antics of Harvard University's AALARM group. Poor boys--all they want is a little respect for bashing the rights of all of those they don't agree with--and I can bet you that AALARM members would do the same thing to groups they disagree with if they could. I was most interested to note that the bulk of their despair was directed toward sexual issues they don't agree with (gays, women's reproductive rights). Will The Times treat us to AALARM's views on racial issues in the next episode?
November 13, 1993
Kelsey Grammer, Teri Garr, Richard Lewis, Mo Gaffney, Bob Saget, Richard Belzer, Judy Tenuta and John Mendoza are scheduled to perform at "Comic's Choice 2," an abortion-rights benefit being held Sunday at the Wilshire Ebell Theatre. Proceeds will go to the National Council of Jewish Women/L.A.'s Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project, which provides financial assistance to low-income women with problem or crisis pregnancies. Tickets for the 7 p.m. program range from $10 to $100.
June 4, 2005 | From Times Wire Reports
A state law banning a type of late-term abortion is unconstitutional because it lacks an exception to protect a woman's health, a federal appeals panel ruled. The 2-1 decision by a panel of the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond upheld a 2003 ruling by a federal judge that said the law was "unconstitutional on its face."
March 30, 1993
I found the commentary by Phillips to be intellectually offensive if not inane. She makes it sound like there is some big conspiracy to oppress women by limiting their reproductive rights. Women have total reproductive control through contraception. (Spare me the insignificant numbers who get pregnant through rape or incest.) Why is it then, when they have not exercised that control, they still must have the right to sacrifice an innocent child created by their lack of control?
Los Angeles Times Articles