Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsSan Onofre
IN THE NEWS

San Onofre

BUSINESS
March 21, 2014 | By Marc Lifsher
SACRAMENTO -- Ratepayers of Southern California Edison Co. and San Diego Gas & Electric Co. could be in line for more than $1 billion in refunds as part of a possible financial settlement from the closure of the San Onofre nuclear power plant. Both Edison and another party to the negotiations, the Utility Reform Network (TURN), a consumer advocacy group, confirmed that a settlement conference is scheduled next Thursday at the San Francisco headquarters of the California Public Utilities Commission.
Advertisement
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
April 23, 2013 | By Abby Sewell, This post has been updated. See the note below for details.
Los Angeles became the latest -- and largest -- city to weigh in on the fate of the San Onofre nuclear plant Tuesday, with the City Council unanimously passing a resolution calling on federal regulators to hold off on deciding whether the plant can restart. The plant has been out of service for more than a year because of unusual wear on steam generator tubes that carry radioactive water. One tube leaked a small amount of radioactive steam last January, prompting the plant's shutdown.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
June 7, 2013 | By Abby Sewell
The fate of the troubled San Onofre nuclear plant was apparently sealed last month when it became clear that a potential lengthy series of hearings would likely have to be held before the coastal facility could be powered back up. The plant, which once supplied power to about 1.4 million homes in Southern California, has been closed for more than a year after a tube leaked a small amount of radioactive steam. On Friday, Edison International announced the facility would be retired.
NEWS
October 4, 2012 | By Paul Whitefield
So, Southern California Edison wants to restart one of San Onofre's nuclear reactors. OK, sure. What could go wrong? (And isn't that the $64-million question that always hangs over nuclear power?) It's not that San Onofre has been trouble-free . Far from it. But it has produced electricity reliably since 1968 -- and Lord knows we need the juice here in Southern California.   And now Edison says that it understands the problems that have caused the plant to be offline for eight months.  Edison wrote that the unusual wear was a result of "fluid elastic instability" -- high-velocity steam flow and low moisture in certain areas that caused the tubes to vibrate excessively and rub against each other.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
September 4, 2013 | By Abby Sewell
Southern California Edison, owner of the now-defunct San Onofre nuclear plant , has made documents available on a website  relating to the ill-fated steam generator replacement that prompted the plant's closure. The documents, some of which had not been previously released, include correspondence and minutes of meetings between staff from Edison and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries - the Japanese company that was contracted to manufacture the replacement generators - about their design, and documents submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
NEWS
May 6, 2013 | By Karin Klein
Southern California Edison officials are saying that if they can't get permission to reopen one of the shuttered reactors at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, they will consider permanently closing the plant this year, according to a report last week from the Associated Press. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is mulling the request to reopen Unit 2 at partial power this summer for a five-month test period, to see if the plant can operate safely at that level after extraordinary wear was found in tubes related to the plant's new steam generators.
NEWS
June 11, 2012 | By Karin Klein
San Onofre's two nuclear-power units have been down for months and will stay that way for months more. Late last week, Southern California Edison officials acknowledged that after early hopes that the reactors would be running safely in time for the summer energy load, it isn't going to happen. They'll have a plan by midsummer for reopening Unit 2, but then the plan will have to go through the lengthy regulatory process. And no one seems even remotely confident of when Unit 3 might return, and if it does, at what level of power?
Los Angeles Times Articles
|