Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsSterilization Services Of California
IN THE NEWS

Sterilization Services Of California

FEATURED ARTICLES
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
July 19, 1990 | MARLA CONE, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The state attorney general sued five companies in Orange and Los Angeles counties Wednesday, alleging that they failed to adequately warn an estimated 3 million people that their plants emit a cancer-causing chemical. The lawsuits are the most sweeping allegations against companies so far stemming from Proposition 65, the groundbreaking anti-toxics measure overwhelmingly approved by voters in 1986.
ARTICLES BY DATE
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
July 19, 1990 | MARLA CONE, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The state attorney general sued five companies in Orange and Los Angeles counties Wednesday, alleging that they failed to adequately warn an estimated 3 million people that their plants emit a cancer-causing chemical. The lawsuits are the most sweeping allegations against companies so far stemming from Proposition 65, the groundbreaking anti-toxics measure overwhelmingly approved by voters in 1986.
Advertisement
NEWS
July 19, 1990 | JILL STEWART, TIMES STAFF WRITER
Atty. Gen. John K. Van de Kamp on Wednesday sued four medical and food sterilization firms in Los Angeles and Orange counties, saying they have exposed an estimated 3 million people to emissions of toxic ethylene oxide, a potent carcinogen that also can cause reproductive abnormalities. In the most sweeping lawsuits ever filed under Proposition 65, the 1986 anti-toxics measure, Van de Kamp charged that the companies failed to adequately warn the public of possible exposure to the toxic gas.
NEWS
July 19, 1990 | JILL STEWART, TIMES STAFF WRITER
Atty. Gen. John K. Van de Kamp on Wednesday sued four medical and food sterilization firms in Los Angeles and Orange counties, saying they have exposed an estimated 3 million people to emissions of toxic ethylene oxide, a potent carcinogen that also can cause reproductive abnormalities. In the most sweeping lawsuits ever filed under Proposition 65, the 1986 anti-toxics measure, Van de Kamp charged that the companies failed to adequately warn the public of possible exposure to the toxic gas.
Los Angeles Times Articles
|