November 19, 2002 |
A federal judge ruled that a Ten Commandments monument installed in Alabama's judicial building by the state's chief justice must be removed because it violates the separation of church and state. "Its sloping top and the religious air of the tablets unequivocally call to mind an open Bible resting on a podium," U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson said. Chief Justice Roy Moore's attorney said the chief justice would appeal.
August 20, 2003 |
A federal appeals court rejected two requests from the chief justice of Alabama's Supreme Court to lift an order to remove his Ten Commandments monument from the state judicial building in Montgomery. The U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Chief Justice Roy Moore's requests, saying he had failed to ask for a stay within the legal time frame after it ruled against him July 1.
September 14, 2003 |
Groups that filed suit to force the removal of a Ten Commandments display from a courthouse facade in West Chester have decided not to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The American Civil Liberties Union filed the suit in October 2001 on behalf of the Freethought Society. The U.S.
February 23, 1997
Re "Defying the Law In Support of the Law" (Feb. 13): What part of the separation of church and state don't Judge Roy Moore, Alabama Gov. Forrest James Jr. and their supporters understand? Far from seeming "a bit trivial," as your story suggests, the issue is the 1st Amendment, the very keystone of our society. With Judge Moore "just saying no" to enforcing the Constitution (his sworn duty) and Gov. James threatening dissenters with physical violence by calling out the National Guard and the state troopers to keep the Ten Commandments plaque in Moore's courtroom)
June 29, 2005
Re "Justices Limit Public Display of Religion," June 28: The U.S. Supreme Court has stated it is OK to display a religious symbol on government property as long as it is for a historical reason and not an endorsement of any one religion. Following that logic, the L.A. County seal (with the cross representing our historical founding) should now be saved from extinction. The cross does not endorse one religion over another, it represents our history. Louis Grinbaum Northridge The only commandment that is even faintly religious is the First: "I am the Lord your God. Thou shalt have no God besides me," which supports monotheism but does not name a specific religion or divine being.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 23, 1999 |
Reaffirming their belief that their schoolchildren lack a moral compass, trustees of the Val Verde Unified School District nonetheless voted Monday night to rescind their earlier decision to post the Ten Commandments at school offices. The district, said school board President Robert Givens, could not afford the legal fees to fight the issue in court, where the matter was headed after a lawsuit was filed last week by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.
August 2, 2001 |
Roy Moore has done it again. On Tuesday, in the wee hours of the morning when nobody was looking, Moore and a couple of workmen sneaked a 5,280-pound granite monument to the Ten Commandments into the rotunda of the Alabama Supreme Court. Moore didn't ask anyone's permission, but he didn't have to. The country judge who rose to prominence by hanging a Ten Commandments plaque on his courtroom wall is now the court's chief justice, the top judge in Alabama.
October 13, 2004 |
The Supreme Court, which has been closely split on religious issues, announced Tuesday that it would decide whether a government display of the Ten Commandments at public buildings violated the 1st Amendment's ban on "an establishment of religion." Plaques and monuments depicting the biblical commandments are at the center of the continuing dispute over the meaning of the U.S. Constitution.
June 28, 2005 |
The Supreme Court, declaring that public officials may not seek to advance or promote religion, on Monday struck down the posting of the Ten Commandments on the walls of two Kentucky courthouses. But the court did not set a clear rule for deciding when the government had gone too far in permitting religious displays, and the decision probably wasn't the last word. In its 5-4 ruling, the court said the commandments were "a sacred text" that carried an "unmistakably religious" message.
CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
November 17, 1999 |
A leading civil rights group filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday to block a rural school district from posting the Ten Commandments in its offices--but the issue could become moot within a week. The lawsuit, prepared by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, said the decision by trustees of the Val Verde Unified School District to display the biblical rules directly ignored a 1980 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that prohibits posting the commandments at schools.