YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsZale Corp

Zale Corp

May 18, 1995 | MIMI KO
A judge Wednesday rejected a proposed settlement of a class-action suit against jewelry store giant Zale Corp. "I've never seen anything like this," Judge James R. Ross said during a fairness hearing at Superior Court in Fullerton. "The settlement is absolutely denied," he said, calling the offer "the greatest advertising scheme I've ever seen." Three law firms--B.
Blaming disappointing Christmas sales and the lingering recession, Zale Corp., the nation's largest retail jewelry chain, said Monday that it will close about 400 of its 2,000 U.S. outlets and restructure its huge debt load. Zale, whose operations have been troubled for two years, also said it will stop making payments on its nearly $1.2 billion in debt until its financial restructuring is complete.
May 25, 1989 | From Reuters
Zale Corp., the nation's largest jewelry chain, moved Wednesday to conquer new regions and younger markets, saying it will buy No. 2 Gordon Jewelry Corp. for $310.9 million. Privately held Zale is offering $36.75 a share for Houston-based Gordon, a chain with more than 600 stores. The new company will have more than 2,000 stores and annual sales of $1.3 billion, analysts said. Gordon shares shot up $6.375 to $36.125 on the New York Stock Exchange, a gain of 21%. The stock was already trading at record levels because of takeover speculation.
September 16, 1986 | J. MICHAEL KENNEDY, Times Staff Writer
Kathy Zweber had this problem. She and her husband, Tim, wanted to have kids. The time was right. The marriage was on solid ground. They were both professionals, she an accountant, he a financial appraiser. With both of them working, they could afford to begin raising a family. The problem was child care. Kathy Zweber didn't want to be away from her children all day, didn't like the idea of dropping them off at a day-care center far from the office.
February 20, 2001 | JAMES PELTZ and MICHAEL HILTZIK
Zale (ZLC) Jim: Buy Mike: Buy * Jim: Our two stocks today both got knocked silly recently, Mike, which no doubt prompts many investors to wonder whether the shares might now be a buy on the premise that the bad news is out of the way. Mike: Except that these situations always beg the question: Is the bad news really out of the way? Sometimes bad news begets more bad news. Jim: Where there's smoke there's fire. Mike: Or a smoke-making machine. Anyway, at Zale Corp.
March 4, 1986
The board determined that it would be inappropriate to consider a previously announced proposal by Peoples Jewellers of Toronto to buy the 85% of Zale that it does not already own. Directors voted after being informed that holders of 32.3% of Zale's outstanding stock had indicated in an SEC filing that they would oppose the merger. The filing was by members of the Zale and Lipshy families. Any merger involving Zale would require the approval of two-thirds of all shareholders.
Los Angeles Times Articles